This recommendation has been downgraded due to unique patient populations and associated costs. The advantages of surgical navigation remain unclear with a majority of studies for outcomes, function, and pain showing no difference when compared to conventional TKA. Seven high quality studies for KSS (Yu 2020, Kim 2018, Kim 2017, Todesca 2017, Blyth 2015, Yan 2015, Tsuda 2021), six high quality studies for WOMAC (Hsu 2019, Kim 2018, Kim 2017, Todesca 2017, Cip 2014, Seon 2009), three high quality studies for OKS (Yu 2020, Yan 2015, Tsuda 2021), eight high quality studies for KSS Function (Selvanayagam 2019, Kim 2018, Kim 2017, Todesca 2017, Blyth 2015, Yan 2015, Tsuda 2021, Thiengwittayaporn 2013), six high quality studies for range of motion (Kim 2018, Kim 2017, Blyth 2015, Yan 2015, Cip 2014, Seon 2009), and four high quality studies for pain (Blyth 2015, Kim 2018, Kim 2017, Hsu 2019) showed no difference between surgical navigation and conventional TKA.
The studies comparing blood loss were heterogenous and reporting methods varied, or details were not given. Two high quality studies (Hsu 2019, Ikawa 2017) were in favor of surgical navigation and two high quality studies (Thiengwittayaporn 2013, Kim 2007) showed no difference for blood loss. There were limited studies regarding complications with two high quality studies (Thiengwittayaporn 2013, Blakeney 2011) showing no difference. Lastly, there was one high quality study (Kim 2018) with a 15-year follow up that showed no difference in radiographic parameters, aseptic loosening, or survivorship between surgical navigation and conventional TKA.
As far as operative time, the majority of studies were in favor of conventional TKA. Four high quality studies (Tsuda 2021, Lutzner 2008, Chin 2005, Blakeney 2011) showed longer operative times and one high quality study (Ikawa 2017) showed longer femoral resection time with surgical navigation.
*KSS = Knee Society Score, WOMAC = Western Ontario and McMaster University osteoarthritis Index, OKS = Oxford Knee Score
Benefits/ Harms of Implementation
Potential benefits for surgical navigation are for specific cases of deformity correction due to trauma or previous retained hardware where conventional instruments cannot be used. Although navigation may result in fewer outliers, increased operative times may lead to increased costs. Furthermore, reliance on computer technology increases the potential to having to abort in the presence of a malfunction.
Outcome Importance
The outcomes between surgical navigation and conventional instruments showed no difference.
Cost Effectiveness / Resource Utilization
Current studies show increased cost to use surgical navigation. However, newer, more cost-effective techniques have been developed and newer studies may change their cost effectiveness and utilization.
Acceptability
The recommendation comes with varying acceptability. Some surgeons may prefer to use surgical navigation even though the outcomes are no different from conventional instruments.
Feasibility
Since there are a number of studies that report no difference in outcomes between surgical navigation and conventional instruments, it may be more feasible to work the downsides of using the technology. Specifically, work on improving efficiency to decrease operating room times and using more cost-effective technology.
Future Research
Since there are multiple studies showing no difference in patient outcomes, the desired benefit would be to show if better alignment reduces loosening and improves survivorship long term with large, randomized studies.
- Blakeney, W. G., Khan, R. J., Wall, S. J. Computer-assisted techniques versus conventional guides for component alignment in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery - American Volume 2011; 15: 1377-84
- Blyth, M. J., Smith, J. R., Anthony, I. C., Strict, N. E., Rowe, P. J., Jones, B. G. Electromagnetic navigation in total knee arthroplasty-a single center, randomized, single-blind study comparing the results with conventional techniques. Journal of Arthroplasty 2015; 2: 199-205
- Cip, J., Widemschek, M., Luegmair, M., Sheinkop, M. B., Benesch, T., Martin, A. Conventional versus computer-assisted technique for total knee arthroplasty: a minimum of 5-year follow-up of 200 patients in a prospective randomized comparative trial. Journal of Arthroplasty 2014; 9: 1795-802
- Hsu, R. W., Hsu, W. H., Shen, W. J., Hsu, W. B., Chang, S. H. Comparison of computer-assisted navigation and conventional instrumentation for bilateral total knee arthroplasty: The outcomes at mid-term follow-up. Medicine 2019; 47: e18083
- Ikawa, T., Takemura, S., Kim, M., Takaoka, K., Minoda, Y., Kadoya, Y. Usefulness of an accelerometer-based portable navigation system in total knee arthroplasty. Bone & Joint Journal 2017; 8: 1047-1052
- Kim, Y. H., Park, J. W., Kim, J. S. 2017 Chitranjan S. Ranawat Award: Does Computer Navigation in Knee Arthroplasty Improve Functional Outcomes in Young Patients? A Randomized Study. Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research 2018; 1: 6-15
- Kim, Y. H., Park, J. W., Kim, J. S. The Clinical Outcome of Computer-Navigated Compared with Conventional Knee Arthroplasty in the Same Patients: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Long-Term Study. Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery - American Volume 2017; 12: 989-996
- Lutzner,J., Krummenauer,F., Wolf,C., Gunther,K.-P., Kirschner,S. Computer-assisted and conventional total knee replacement: A comparative, prospective, randomised study with radiological and CT evaluation. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series B 2008; 8: 1039-1044
- Selvanayagam, R., Kumar, V., Malhotra, R., Srivastava, D. N., Digge, V. K. A prospective randomized study comparing navigation versus conventional total knee arthroplasty. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery 2019; 2: 2309499019848079
- Thiengwittayaporn, S., Kanjanapiboonwong, A., Junsee, D. Midterm outcomes of electromagnetic computer-assisted navigation in minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty. 2013; 0: 37
- Todesca, A., Garro, L., Penna, M., Bejui-Hugues, J. Conventional versus computer-navigated TKA: a prospective randomized study. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 2017; 6: 1778-1783
- Tsuda, K., Shibuya, T., Okamoto, N., Shiigi, E., Shirakawa, N., Hosaka, K., Akagi, R., Ohdera, T. Can accuracy with the iASSIST navigation be confirmed by assessment? A multi-center prospective randomized controlled trial with independent three-dimensional image assessment. Knee 2021; 0: 344-352
- Yan, C. H., Chiu, K. Y., Ng, F. Y., Chan, P. K., Fang, C. X. Comparison between patient-specific instruments and conventional instruments and computer navigation in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 2015; 12: 3637-45
- Yu, X., Chen, G., Li, Z., Xu, R., She, Y., Zhang, X., Zhang, H. Alignment results of infrared computer-assisted navigation of total knee arthroplasty for end-stage knee osteoarthritis. American Journal Of Translational Research 2020; 8: 4772-4780